🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 810+ reviews
Menāœ“ In StockšŸ”„ Bestseller

28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash

ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…4.2 out of 5(810 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$35
$58.33
Sale
āœ“ complimentary fulfillment on this item • Limited time offer

super sick baggy jeans size 28x30 been worn a little but not to much paid 100$ asking 35 obo

šŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy Shipping
ā†©ļø
uncomplicated Returns

šŸ“‹ Product Description

28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash

super sick baggy jeans size 28x30 been worn a little but not to much paid 100$ asking 35 obo​

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Men products.

šŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 23570

Category: Men > Jeans > Baggy, Loose

Original Price:$58.33 USD

Sale Price:$35 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 distribution & Returns

āœ“ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Based on 810 reviews
AH
Andrew Hall āœ“ Verified
2 weeks ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
superb for 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash
Honestly, the 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash works well enough which is good enough. Packaging was straightforward.
KC
Kayla Campbell āœ“ Verified
1 month ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
terrific 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash!
At first, the 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash fits my needs so I’m okay with it.
JB
Justin Baker āœ“ Verified
4 weeks ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
superb 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash!
So far, the 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash is practical and it meets expectations. Works fine so far.
BW
Brandon Wright āœ“ Verified
1 week ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
supreme Purchase Ever
The 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash is effortless to use and looks terrific. So happy with this purchase!
DC
Daniel Clark āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
splendid Value for Money
After certain use, the 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash performs as expected and it works for me.